Skip to main content

Full text of "Black universes with trapped ghosts"

See other formats


Grav. Cosmol. 17 (2), 176-180 (2011) 



Black universes with trapped ghosts^ 

K. A. Bronnikov'^'^'^ and E. V. Donskoy'' 

" Center of Gravitation and Fundamental Metrology, VNIIMS, Ozyornaya St. 46, Moscow 119361, Russia 
^ Institute of Gravitation and Gosmology, PFUR, Miklukho-Maklaya St. 6, Moscow 117198, Russia 



o 

(N 
o 

o 

(N 



A black universe is a nonsingular black hole where, beyond the horizon, there is an expanding, asymptotically 
isotropic universe. Such models have been previously found as solutions of general relativity with a phantom 
scalar field as a source of gravity and, without phantoms, in a brane world of RS2 type. Here we construct 
examples of static, spherically symmetric black-universe solutions in general relativity with a minimally 
coupled scalar field whose kinetic energy is negative in a restricted strong-field region of space-time and 
positive outside it. Thus in such configurations a "ghost" is trapped in a small part of space, which may in 
principle explain why no ghosts are observed under usual conditions. 



O 
I , 



> 

o 
m 
o 



X 



1 Introduction 

The existence of singularities is an undesired but 
probably inevitable feature of the classical theo- 
ries of gravity. Singularities are places where gen- 
eral relativity or another classical theory of gravity 
does not work, so that the theory itself reveals the 
limits of its validity. Thus a full understanding of 
the physics of phenomena under study (origin and 
fate of our Universe, gravitational collapse etc.) re- 
quires either avoidance of singularities or / and mod- 
ification of the corresponding classical theory, or 
addressing quantum effects. There have been nu- 
merous attempts on this trend, some of them sug- 
gesting that singularities inside the event horizons 
of black holes should be replaced with a kind of 
regular core ( [1] , see [2] for a recent review) , others 
describing bouncing or "emergent" universes (see, 
e.g., [3, 4] for reviews). 

In our view, of particular interest are mod- 
els that combine avoidance of singularities in both 
black holes and cosmology, those which have been 
termed black universes [5, 6]. These are regu- 
lar black holes (spherically symmetric ones in the 
known examples) where a possible explorer, after 
crossing the event horizon, gets into an expanding 
universe instead of a singularity. Thus such hypo- 
thetic configurations combine the properties of a 



^Talk given at the International Conference RUDN-10, 
June 28 — July 3, 2010, PFUR, Moscow 
^e-mail: kb20@yandex.ru 



wormhole (absence of a center, a regular minimum 
of the area function) and a black hole (a Killing 
horizon separating R and T regions). Moreover, 
the Kantowski-Sachs cosmology in the T region is 
asymptotically isotropic and approaches a de Sit- 
ter mode of expansion, which makes such models 
potentially viable as models of our accelerating 
Universe. 

Precisely as traversable Lorentzian wormholes, 
black universes as solutions to the equations of gen- 
eral relativity require "exotic" , or phantom matter, 
i.e., matter that violates the null energy condition. 
This can be most easily shown in the case of spher- 
ical symmetry. 

Various kinds of phantom matter are discussed 
in cosmology as possible dark energy candidates. 
Meanwhile, macroscopic phantom matter has not 
yet been observed. There exist theoretical argu- 
ments both pro et contra phantom fields, and the 
latter seem somewhat stronger, see, e.g., a discus- 
sion in [7]. 

In [7] it has been shown that black-universe 
models can be obtained without invoking phantom 
fields in the framework of the RS2-type [8] brane- 
world scenario, using the modified Einstein equa- 
tions [9] describing gravity on the brane. In the 
black- universe solutions of [7], the role of exotic 
matter in the field equations is played by the "tidal" 
term of geometric origin, which has no reason to 
respect the energy conditions known for physically 
plausible matter fields. In such a scenario, worm- 



2 



hole solutions even without ordinary matter are 
also known [10]. 

In this paper, we would like to discuss another 
opportunity [11] of obtaining wormholc and black- 
universe configurations in the framework of gen- 
eral relativity, with a kind of matter which pos- 
sesses phantom properties only in a restricted re- 
gion of space, a strong-field region, whereas far 
away from it all standard energy conditions are ob- 
served. As an example of such matter, we con- 
sider static, spherically symmetric configurations 
of a minimally coupled scalar field with the La- 
grangian^ 

Ls = ^hicf>)g'"'d^cj>d,cl> - (1) 

where h{(f)) and V{<^) are arbitrary functions. If 
h{4>) has a variable sign, it cannot be absorbed by 
re-definition of (p in its whole range. Cases of in- 
terest are those where h > (that is, the scalar 
field is canonical, with positive kinetic energy) in a 
weak field region and ^ < (the scalar field is 
of phantom, or ghost nature) in some restricted 
region where, e.g., a wormhole throat can be ex- 
pected. In this sense it can be said that the ghost 
is trapped. A possible transition between h > 
and /i < in cosmology was considered in [12]. 
Examples of such "trapped-ghost" wormholes have 
been obtained in [11]. 

The paper is organized as follows. In Section 
2 we present the basic equations and make some 
general observations. In Section 3 we obtain ex- 
plicit examples of "trapped-ghost" black-universe 
solutions using the inverse-problem method, and 
Section 4 is a brief conclusion. 

2 Scalar fields with a variable ki- 
netic term 

The general static, spherically symmetric metric 
can be written as 

ds^ = A{u)dt^ ~J(uj~ ^'(")^^'' (2) 

where we are using the so-called quasiglobal gauge 

ffooSii = ~lj ^(^) is called the redshift function 
and r{u) the area function; dO."^ = {dO"^ +siv? 6 dtp^) 

^We choose the metric signature (-f-, — , — , — ), the units 
c = h = 8itG = 1 , and the sign of such that Tq is the 
energy density. 



is the linear element on a unit sphere. The metric 
is only formally static: it is really static if ^ > 0, 
but it describes a Kantowski-Sachs type cosmology 
if ^ < 0, and u is then a temporal coordinate. 
In cases where A changes its sign, regions where 
A > and A < are called R- and T-regions, 
respectively. 

Let us specify which kinds of functions r(?i) and 
A(u) are required for the metric (2) to describe a 
black universe. 

1. Regularity in the whole range u G M. 

2. Asymptotic flatness as u ^ +oo (without 
loss of generality), i.e., r{u) ^ u, A{u) — 1; 

3. A de Sitter asymptotic as u — t- — oo, i.e., a T 
region [A < 0) where r{u) ~ \u\, —A{u) ^ 

4. A single simple horizon (i.e., a simple zero of 
A{u)) at finite u. It is an event horizon as 

seen from the static side, and it is the starting 
point of the cosmological evolution as seen 
from the T-region. 

The existence of two asymptotic regions r ~ |n| 
as u — 7- iboo requires at least one regular minimum 
of r{u) at some u = uq, at which 

r = ro > 0, / = 0, r" > 0, (3) 

where the prime stands for d/du. (In special cases 
where r" = at the minimum, we inevitably have 
r" > in its neighborhood.) 

The necessity of violating the weak and null en- 
ergy conditions at such minima follows from the 
Einstein equations. Indeed, one of them reads 

2At"/t = -{TI-T:), (4) 

where are components of the stress-energy ten- 
sor (SET). 

In an R-region (^4 > 0), the condition r" > 
implies Tj — < 0; in the usual notations Tj = 
p (density) and —T^ = pr (radial pressure) it is 
rewritten as p -|- < , which manifests violation 
of the weak and null energy conditions. It is the 
simplest proof of this well-known violation near a 
throat of a static, spherically symmetric wormhole 
( [13]; see also [14]). 

However, a minimum of r{u) can occur in a T- 
region, and it is then not a throat but a bounce in 



3 



the evolution of one of the Kantowski-Sachs scale 
factors (the other scale factor is [— ^(u)]^/^ ). Since 
in a T-region f is a spatial coordinate and ?/, tempo- 
ral, the meaning of the SET components is — T/ = 
Pt (pressure in the t direction) and = p; never- 
theless, the condition r" > applied to (4) again 
leads to p+pt < 0, violating the energy conditions. 
In the intermediate case where a minimum of r{u) 
coincides with a horizon (A = 0), the condition 
r" > holds in its vicinity, along with all its con- 
sequences. Thus the energy conditions are violated 
near a minimum of r in all cases. 

Let us now turn to the scalar field 0(m) with the 
Lagrangian (1). In a space-time with the metric (2) 
it has the SET 



T;: = ^h{u)A{u)<p'{ufdiag{l, -1, 1, 1) 

+ sr,v{u). 



(5) 



The kinetic energy density is positive if h{(p) > 
and negative if h{(f)) < 0, so the solutions sought 
for must be obtained with /t > at large values of 
the spherical radius r(n) and /i < at smaller radii 
r. It has been shown [11] that this goal cannot be 
achieved for a massless field {V{(f)) = 0). 

Thus we seek black-universe configurations with 
a nonzero potential V{(f)) , The Einstein-scalar equa- 
tions can be written as 



Ar'^h'4>' = 


r^dV/d(t), 


(6) 


{A'r^ = 


-2rV; 


(7) 


2r"/r = 




(8) 


' - r^A" = 


2, 


(9) 


■' + Ar'^ = 


r2(iM0'2 _ V), 


(10) 



A{r' 



Eq. (6) follows from (7)-(9), which, given the po- 
tential V{(j)) and the kinetic function h((j)) , form 
a determined set of equations for the unknowns 
r{u), A{u), (f){u). Eq. (10) (the (\) component 
of the Einstein equations), free from second-order 
derivatives, is a first integral of (6)-(9) and can be 
obtained from (7)-(9) by excluding second-order 
derivatives. Moreover, Eq. (9) can be integrated 
giving 

B'{u) = {A/r^y = 2(3m - u)/r\ (11) 

where B[u) = Ajr^ and m is an integration con- 
stant equal to the Schwarzschild mass if the met- 
ric (2) is asymptotically flat asu— >-oo (r^i-u. 



A = \ — 2m/u + o{l/u) ). If there is a flat asymp- 
totic as n ^ — oo, the Schwarzschild mass there is 
equal to —m {r ^\u\, A = 1 + 2m/\u\ + o{l/u) . 

One more observation is that if the system con- 
tains a horizon and r(u) ^ \u\ at large 1^1 in the 
T-region, then B = Ajr^ tends to a finite limit, 
which means that there is a de Sitter asymptotic. 
Indeed, under these conditions the integral of (11) 
evidently converges at large so B tends to a 
constant. Furthermore, Eq. (9) can be rewritten 
as r^B" + Ar^r'B' = -2, hence B" < where 
B' = 0, so B{u) cannot have a minimum (and it is 
this circumstance that restricts the possible kinds 
of global causal structure of any scalar- vacuum so- 
lutions [15]). This means that B{u) can only tend 
to a negative constant in a T-region. 

Thus, in the Einstein-scalar system (6)-(10), 
any solution with a horizon and r ~ \u\ as u — )■ 
iboo is asymptotically de Sitter in the T-region. 
It describes a black universe if it is, in addition, 
asymptotically flat in the R-region. 

3 Black universe models with a 
trapped ghost 

If one specifies the functions V{^) and h{^) in 
the Lagrangian (1), it is, in general, very hard to 
solve the above equations. Alternatively, to find 
examples of solutions possessing particular proper- 
ties, one may employ the inverse problem method, 
choosing some of the functions r{u), A{u) or (j){u) 
and then reconstructing the form of V{(/)) and/or 
h{(p). We will do so, choosing a function r{u) that 
can provide a black-universe solution. Then A{u) 
is found from (11) and V{u) from (7). The func- 
tion (^{u) is found from (8) provided h{(f)) is known; 
however, using the scalar field parametrization free- 
dom, we can, vice versa, choose a monotonic func- 
tion (l){u) (which will yield an unambiguous func- 
tion V{(f))) and find h{u) from Eq. (8). 

A simple example of the function r{u) satisfy- 
ing the requirements 1-3 is (see Fig. 1): 



r{u) = a 



(x^ -I- n) 



n = const > 2. 



(12) 



where x = u/a, and a > is an arbitrary constant 
(the minimum radius) . It is the same function that 
led to symmetric wormhole solutions in [11] under 
the additional assumption m = . 



4 



V 14- 


// 


• \ 


/ 


'• \ 19- 




'•■ V 




'■, \\ 10- 


A ■' 


■ \ 


// ■' 
/ 


'•• \\ -,/ 8- 


// ■■' 


. A r(u)/a 


// ■■' 


6- 


A ■■' 




// ■■' 


■•• \\ 4- 


A ■■' 




A/ ■■' 


1 1 ■ 1 ■ 1 1 1 1 1 1 ■ ■ ■ ■ 





-15 



-10 



10 



15 



ula 



Figure 1: Plots of r{u)/a given by Eq. (12) witli n = 
3, 5, 10 (solid, dashed, and dotted lines, respectively). 



Let us now integrate Eq. (11), assuming m > 0. 
We find (see Fig. 2) 

+ 3a:2n(n + 1) + n^(n^ + n + 1) 



B{u) 



+ 



mx 



3a2(a;2 + n)3 
3x^(5n2 + 2n + l) 



Sa?n{x'^ + n)^ 
+ 8ra^(5n^ + 2n - 1) + 3n^(lln^ - 2n - 1] 

The emerging integration constant is excluded by 
the requirement _B — t- as u — t- oo, providing 
asymptotic flatness. Examples of the behavior of 
B{u) for m = 0.2a and some values of the param- 
eter n are presented in Fig. 2. 

Substituting the expressions 12 and 13 into 7, 
taking into account that A{u) = Bjr^ ^ we obtain 
the potential F as a function oi u oy x = uj a. This 
expression is rather bulky and will not be presented 
here. 

To construct V as an unambiguous function of 
(\) and to find /i(^) , it makes sense to choose a 
monotonic function ^{u). It is convenient to as- 
sume 



[u) = arctan — , 

TT n 



7ra _ /2(n-2) 



n 



(14) 



and (f) has a finite range: (f) ^ {~4>o^4>o)i which 
is common to kink configurations. Thus we have 
X = u/a = ratan(7r0/20o) ) whose substitution into 
the expression for V{u) gives V{(j)) defined in this 
finite range. The function V{^) can be extended to 




r ■ I r~ 

10 20 
u/a 



30 



Figure 2: Plots of B{u) given by Eq. 13 for m = 0.2a, 
n = 3, 5, 10 (solid, dashed, and dotted lines, respec- 
tively). 




-1,5 -1,0 -0,5 """0,5 1,0 1,5 



Figure 3: Plots of V{u) for m = 0.2a and n = 3, 5, 10 
(solid, dashed, and dotted lines, respectively). 



5 




Figure 4: Plots of h{4>) given by Eq. 15 with n = 
3, 5, 10 (solid, dashed, and dotted lines, respectively). 



the whole real axis, (/> G M, by supposing V{(j)) = 
at > 00 and V{4>) = V{-(po) > at < -^o- 
Plots of V{cl)) are presented in Fig. 3 for the same 
values of the parameters as in Fig. 2. 

The expression for h{4>) is found from (8) as 
follows: 

{n-2)x^ + 71^(1 



h{cf>) 



2n) 



(15) 



a2(n-2)(x2 + n) ' 

where x = ntan(7r0/2(/>o) . The function h{(j)) 
given by Eq. (15) is also defined in the interval 
(— (/)o,(/'o) and can be extended to M by supposing 
/i((/>) = 1 at > (f)Q. The extended kinetic cou- 
pling function h{(j)) is plotted in Fig. 4. Evidently, 
the null energy condition is violated only where 
h{(l)) < 0. 

4 Conclusion 

It has been shown [11] that a minimally coupled 
scalar field may change its nature from canoni- 
cal to ghost in a smooth way without creating 
any space-time singularities. This feature, in par- 
ticular, allows for construction of wormhole mod- 
els (trapped-ghost wormholes) where the ghost is 
present in some restricted region around the throat 
(of arbitrary size) whereas in the weak-field region 
far from it the scalar has usual canonical prop- 
erties. The same model has been modified here 
to construct another interesting type of configura- 
tions, black universes. 

It has also been found that, in the Einstein- 
scalar field system under study, a static, spheri- 
cally symmetric configuration is inevitably a black 



universe if it is asymptotically flat, has a horizon, 
and the function r{u) grows linearly as u ^ ±oo. 
Though, all this can only happen if the scalar is of 
ghost nature at least in some part of space. 

Acknowledgments 

This work was supported in part by the Russian 
Foundation for Basic Research grant 09-02-00677a 
and by NPK MU grant at PFUR. 

References 

[1] I. Dymnikova, Gen. Rel. Grav. 24, 235 (1992). 

[2] 1. Dymnikova and E. Galaktionov, Phys. Lett. B 
645, 358 (2007). 

[3] P. Dzierzak, J. Jezierski, P. Malkiewicz, and W. 
Piechocki, arXiv: 0810.3172. 

[4] D.J. Mulryse, R. Tavakol, J.E. Lidsey and G.F.R. 
Ellis, Phys. Rev. D 71, 123512 (2005); 
S. Mukherejee, B.C. Paul, S.D. Maharaj and A. 
Beesham, gr-qc/0505103. 

[5] K.A. Bronnikov and J.C. Fabris, Phys. Rev. Lett. 
96, 251101 (2006). 

[6] K.A. Bronnikov, V.N. Mclnikov and H. Dehnen, 
Gen. Rel. Grav. 39, 973 (2007). 

[7] K.A. Bronnikov and E.V. Donskoy, Grav. Cosmol. 
16, 42 (2010). 

[8] L. Randall and R. Sundrum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 
4690 (1999), hep-ph/9906064. 

[9] T. Shiromizu, K. Maeda and M. Sasaki, Phys. Rev. 
D 62, 024012 (2000). 

[10] K.A. Bronnikov and S.-W. Kim, Phys. Rev. D 67, 
064027 (2003), gr-qc/0212112. 

[11] K.A. Bronnikov and S.V. Sushkov, Class. Quantum 
Grav. 27, 095022 (2010). 

[12] H. Kroger, G. Melkonian and S.G. Rubin, Gen. Rel. 
Grav. 36, 1649 (2004); astro-ph/0310182. 

[13] M.S. Morris and K.S. Thorne, Am. J. Phys. 56, 
395 (1988). 

[14] K.A. Bronnikov and S.G. Rubin, Lectures on Grav- 
itation and Cosmology (MlFl press, Moscow, 2008, 
in Russian). 

[15] K.A. Bronnikov, Phys. Rev. D 64, 064013 (2001), 

gr-qc/0104092; 

K.A. Bronnikov, J. Math. Pliys. 43, 6096 (2002), 
gr-qc/0204001; 

K.A. Bronnikov and G.N. Shikin, Grav. Cosmol. 8, 
107 (2002).